How Musk and crypto bros get away with it
6/8/2022, 04:49 PM
-tech upstarts like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, and that he’s just better at it. That’s not the case. Musk’s superpower isn’t that he’s better at breaking the rules; it’s that he’s better at getting away with it. And that’s a different thing entirely.
One of the biggest advantages you can have in life is the superpower of “getting away with shit”. If you manage to play by different rules from the people you’re competing against, you can appear unstoppable.
Sign up for our weekly technology newsletter, TechScape.
If you’re good enough at it, you can reveal that even deeply foundational rules of the system are, in practice, just guidelines, a gentleman’s agreement, or just politeness. The rise of Donald Trump in US politics, for instance, led to half a decade of commentators insisting he couldn’t do things that he, in fact, could and did do. (Depending on how you interact with politics, I can direct you to this comment piece or this viral tweet for an elaboration of that argument.) Tech news this week has been dominated by two things: Elon Musk’s will-he-won’t-he game with Twitter, and the collateral damage across the crypto sector of the collapse of the stablecoin TerraUSD. But really, it’s been dominated by one thing: the incredible power of getting away with shit.
--- Elon Musk’s long history of acting with impunity is well documented, in part because so much of what he’s got away with directly involves the social network he’s currently (maybe) buying.
There was the time he called a British cave diver a “pedo guy”, tweeted that if he wasn’t a paedophile he would sue, sent material suggesting he was a paedophile to a reporter, and then won in court based on the argument that he hadn’t intended to imply he was really a paedophile, and said sorry anyway. There was the time he tweeted that he would be taking Tesla private at a valuation of $420 dollars a share (he didn’t) and that he had funding secured (he hadn’t).
And there was the time he bought a five per cent stake in a publicly traded company, failed to disclose the stake when he was legally required to, saved $143m as he continued to build up his stake in secret, eventually disclosed his stake and committed to being a passive investor, immediately started pushing for changes to the company’s product, accepted a seat on the board and admitted he was an activist investor, then rejected the seat on the board and launched a takeover bid for the company. And we’re up to the present day.
Some may dispute that Musk has in fact got away with all that. Yes, he won in court against Vernon Unsworth, the British diver; but he was slapped with a fine by the SEC for his “funding secured” tweets, and is under investigation by the regulator for his missing disclosures over the Twitter purchase (for that, in case you weren’t paying attention, was the public company). But the odds are slim that Musk ends up paying a fine even close to the $143m he saved delaying his Twitter disclosure; and as for the SEC oversight following his bad tweets, well, take a look at his tweets since then to see quite how much the regulator is encouraging him to constrain himself.
Despite that history, a lot of people seem to be under the impression that Musk is playing the same game as hi-tech upstarts like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, and that he’s just better at it. That’s not the case. Musk’s superpower isn’t that he’s better at breaking the rules; it’s that he’s better at getting away with it. And that’s a different thing entirely.
One of the biggest advantages you can have in life is the superpower of “getting away with shit”. If you manage to play by different rules from the people you’re competing against, you can appear unstoppable.
Sign up for our weekly technology newsletter, TechScape.
If you’re good enough at it, you can reveal that even deeply foundational rules of the system are, in practice, just guidelines, a gentleman’s agreement, or just politeness. The rise of Donald Trump in US politics, for instance, led to half a decade of commentators insisting he couldn’t do things that he, in fact, could and did do. (Depending on how you interact with politics, I can direct you to this comment piece or this viral tweet for an elaboration of that argument.) Tech news this week has been dominated by two things: Elon Musk’s will-he-won’t-he game with Twitter, and the collateral damage across the crypto sector of the collapse of the stablecoin TerraUSD. But really, it’s been dominated by one thing: the incredible power of getting away with shit.
--- Elon Musk’s long history of acting with impunity is well documented, in part because so much of what he’s got away with directly involves the social network he’s currently (maybe) buying.
There was the time he called a British cave diver a “pedo guy”, tweeted that if he wasn’t a paedophile he would sue, sent material suggesting he was a paedophile to a reporter, and then won in court based on the argument that he hadn’t intended to imply he was really a paedophile, and said sorry anyway. There was the time he tweeted that he would be taking Tesla private at a valuation of $420 dollars a share (he didn’t) and that he had funding secured (he hadn’t).
And there was the time he bought a five per cent stake in a publicly traded company, failed to disclose the stake when he was legally required to, saved $143m as he continued to build up his stake in secret, eventually disclosed his stake and committed to being a passive investor, immediately started pushing for changes to the company’s product, accepted a seat on the board and admitted he was an activist investor, then rejected the seat on the board and launched a takeover bid for the company. And we’re up to the present day.
Some may dispute that Musk has in fact got away with all that. Yes, he won in court against Vernon Unsworth, the British diver; but he was slapped with a fine by the SEC for his “funding secured” tweets, and is under investigation by the regulator for his missing disclosures over the Twitter purchase (for that, in case you weren’t paying attention, was the public company). But the odds are slim that Musk ends up paying a fine even close to the $143m he saved delaying his Twitter disclosure; and as for the SEC oversight following his bad tweets, well, take a look at his tweets since then to see quite how much the regulator is encouraging him to constrain himself.
Despite that history, a lot of people seem to be under the impression that Musk is playing the same game as hi-tech upstarts like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, and that he’s just better at it. That’s not the case. Musk’s superpower isn’t that he’s better at breaking the rules; it’s that he’s better at getting away with it. And that’s a different thing entirely.